How Google Tag Gateway and Server-Side GTM Give Marketers the Best of Both Worlds

Discover how Google Tag Gateway and Server-Side GTM create a privacy-first, first-party data pipeline that boosts tracking accuracy and compliance.

Jasmine Libert

Senior Vice President, Data Solutions

"I like to think about this stuff in my free time. "

Marketers operate in a challenging measurement environment. Browser vendors, regulators, and consumers are all demanding greater privacy protections, while marketing teams still need reliable conversion tracking and analytics to optimize campaigns.

Third-party cookies, once the backbone of digital measurement, are being deprecated. Safari and Firefox already restrict them heavily, and Chrome may or may not roll out its own phase-out. Meanwhile, ad blockers and privacy tools are growing in adoption, cutting into the signals marketers depend on.

Against this backdrop, Google has released two key solutions: Google Tag Gateway (GTG), formerly known as First-Party Mode, and Server-Side Google Tag Manager (ssGTM). When implemented together, these tools create a first-party data pipeline that is both advantageous and compliant.

At Napkyn, we often hear clients frame the challenge as a trade-off: “Do we want stronger tracking, or do we want to be privacy compliant?” The truth is that with GTG and ssGTM, you don’t have to choose. You can have both.

The challenge isn’t how to get around these protections, but how to work within them responsibly. The most successful organizations are finding ways to preserve insight while honoring user intent, proving that it’s possible to be both robust and responsible.

A New Kind of Measurement

Today’s analytics ecosystem requires collaboration between marketing, engineering, and privacy teams. Tools like Google Tag Gateway (GTG) and Server-Side Tag Manager (ssGTM) reflect this shift toward first-party control, transparency, and compliance.

The right question isn’t “How do we keep all our tags firing?”, it’s “How do we keep learning from our data while respecting consent?” When configured with governance and consent enforcement in mind, these tools create a sustainable foundation for both ethical data collection and smarter marketing.

Google Tag Gateway: Bringing Tags Into Your Domain

GTG is designed to solve a specific but important problem: how browsers classify and treat requests. Normally, a Google tag like gtag.js or gtm.js is loaded from Google’s own servers (googletagmanager.com). To browsers, that looks like a third-party request, and many privacy tools block or degrade it.

GTG changes that by allowing you to serve those same tag scripts from your own domain. Behind the scenes, your CDN or server proxies the script request to Google and delivers it back under your domain. To the browser, the file looks like a natural part of your site.

Why this matters:

Resilience against blocking: Tags that look first-party are less likely to be blocked by browsers or extensions. This translates into more complete measurement. Some advertisers have reported conversion lift of 10–15% after GTG adoption.
Privacy alignment: Data still flows through your domain first, creating a checkpoint where consent enforcement or masking rules can be applied.
Stability: By reducing reliance on third-party calls, you reduce exposure to sudden browser updates that can break traditional setups.

Example: A large e-commerce brand deployed GTG using Cloudflare’s integration. Within weeks, their analytics teams noticed an 11% increase in checkout completions being recorded. The sales were always happening, GTG simply ensured that the signals weren’t lost to browser blocking. This gave the marketing team more confidence in their attribution and allowed them to recalibrate paid media budgets with better data.

Server-Side GTM: Centralizing Governance and Reducing Browser Load

While GTG addresses where tags are served from, server-side GTM focuses on how data is collected and distributed. In a standard client-side setup, the browser loads multiple vendor scripts and fires data directly to each endpoint - Google Analytics, Ads, Facebook, etc. Each script consumes bandwidth, competes for execution, and sets cookies.

With ssGTM, the model changes. The browser fires a single request to your server container, typically hosted on Google Cloud Run under your subdomain (e.g., analytics.yourbrand.com). The server container then processes that payload and routes it to the right destinations.

Why this matters:

Performance: A single outbound request replaces dozens of third-party calls, reducing page load time and improving customer experience.
Data control: The server container acts as a governance layer. You can strip out sensitive data (like IP addresses), apply regional consent logic, enrich events with CRM attributes, or enforce consent before data is forwarded.
First-party cookies: Because requests come from your domain, cookies set via ssGTM are treated as first-party and persist longer than third-party cookies, improving attribution.
Flexibility: Changes to tagging logic can be made server-side without code pushes to the site, allowing faster adaptation to regulatory or platform updates.

Example: A media streaming company implemented ssGTM to improve both governance and enrichment. Their server container removed personally identifiable information from analytics events while appending subscription tier data from their CRM. This allowed their marketing team to segment campaigns by customer value, while ensuring no sensitive fields ever reached third-party vendors.

Why Use GTG + ssGTM Together?

On their own, GTG and ssGTM both strengthen measurement. Used together, they create a first-party data pipeline that is more reliable, compliant, and adaptable.

More reliable tracking: GTG ensures tags are delivered in a first-party context, while ssGTM ensures that the data collected is processed securely and consistently.
Stronger compliance: Data flows through your domain and your server before leaving for external platforms, giving you checkpoints to enforce consent and governance.
More control over what’s on your site: With ssGTM in the mix, you can also consolidate much, and potentially all, of your third-party measurement under the GTG-hosted Google tag, using server-side tagging to send data to other vendors, so they can’t dynamically change the behavior of scripts running in your customers’ browsers.
Better optimization inputs: More complete conversion data allows advertising platforms to optimize with greater accuracy.
Stable infrastructure: The combined setup is less affected by changes to browser rules or third-party cookie policies.

This is where the misconception falls away: GTG and ssGTM don’t force a trade-off. They give marketers the best of both worlds, robust measurement and privacy-first governance - working with privacy expectations instead of against them, using technology to strengthen both performance and accountability.

Example: A global financial services client implemented GTG and ssGTM across multiple brands and regions. GTG stabilized their web tracking, while ssGTM enforced regional consent rules and standardized event data across properties. The result: more complete attribution, improved compliance reporting, and a governance model that could scale globally. For their marketing teams, this meant the freedom to optimize campaigns confidently while knowing compliance teams were comfortable with the setup.

The Myth of the Trade-Off

A common misconception we hear is that marketing teams must choose between robust tracking and privacy compliance. What you get implementing GTG and ssGTM together demonstrates that this is a false choice. By adopting first-party infrastructure, marketers can capture more reliable data and apply the strictest privacy standards at the same time.

This balance is no longer optional, it’s becoming a baseline expectation from both platforms and consumers alike. Companies that continue to rely solely on traditional third-party tagging risk both data loss and compliance exposure.

Technical Nuances Worth Noting

For teams evaluating these solutions, a few technical considerations often come up:

Deployment options. GTG can be deployed via supported CDNs like Cloudflare, Fastly, or Google Cloud CDN, or manually through your own servers. ssGTM containers are typically hosted in Google Cloud, but can also run on other infrastructure.
Consent integration. Both GTG and ssGTM can integrate with Consent Management Platforms (CMPs), ensuring only permitted tags fire.
Data enrichment. ssGTM makes it possible to join behavioral data with back-end systems (CRM, order management) before forwarding to analytics platforms.
Security. By reducing third-party scripts in the browser, ssGTM minimizes the attack surface for malicious code injection.
Performance metrics. Many Napkyn clients monitor Core Web Vitals and have seen improvements after offloading scripts to ssGTM.

Final Thought: A Durable Foundation for Marketing with Napkyn

GTG and ssGTM represent a shift in how marketers approach measurement. They replace fragile, third-party-dependent setups with first-party, privacy-first infrastructure. The payoff is clear, marketers can recover lost conversions, feed more accurate data into ad platforms, and meet rising expectations for compliance and transparency.

At Napkyn, we help organizations design and implement these solutions end-to-end - from evaluating CDN options for GTG, to architecting scalable server-side GTM containers, to aligning with your privacy office. We’ve seen firsthand how these investments unlock both performance gains and risk reduction.

If your organization is wrestling with the trade-off between tracking accuracy and privacy compliance, let’s talk. Napkyn can help you build a first-party data pipeline that gives you both.

More Insights